 |
I believe it does. Its what many of us use as a cheap alternative. What do others say?
Posted 11 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
Yes.
Posted 11 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
They don't give you 1:1 or better as a dedicated solution to macro, So I'd say they would count as poor man. Also figuring you probably spent less than $50 on a couple of them.
Originally posted 11 months ago.
(
permalink
)
gfrphoto edited this topic 11 months ago.
|
 |
I hope so. I got a set with a +1 +2 and +4 years ago, and I still use them. I like them a lot, as it is an inexpensive and easy alternative.
Posted 11 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
Thank you. Yep I paid way less than $50. $8.15 on ebay to be exact. I can't wait until i get them!
Posted 11 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
I just picked up a set (+1, +2, and +4) last week for my 50mm lens. And as a bonus, I just figured out that they fit my 20 year old Nikkor 35-70mm zoom lens as well.
I can't wait to play around with these more.
Posted 3 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
I bought a set, but it's gonna take me some time to get used to them.
Posted 3 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
yes they should qualify
Posted 5 days ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
"They don't give you 1:1 or better as a dedicated solution to macro,"
The + bits are in dioptres, and +10 dioptre is designed to produce true 1:1 macro when used with a 50mm equivalent lens.
In theory you could add all 4 together to make +17 but that would be fuzzy as heck :P
Posted 5 days ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
g~ 
says:
i am poor and those, for now, are my choice of macro. so.. yes?
Posted 5 days ago.
(
permalink
)
|
Would you like to comment?
Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).
|
Poor-Man's Macro (PLEASE, read the description carefully!) /
Discuss
Feed – Subscribe to Poor-Man's Macro (PLEASE, read the description carefully!) discussion threads
Flickr Blog |
About Flickr |
Terms of Use |
Your Privacy |
Copyright/IP Policy | Report Abuse
|
Deutsch
|
English
|
Español
|
Français
|
|
Italiano
|
Português
Copyright © 2008 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Save to del.icio.us