|
Awesome! I know what my plans for the night are! :D
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
oooh, sets within sets... that'll be collections then... Gigs > Foo Fighters here I come...
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
We were waiting for it for sooooooooooooooooooooooo long!!
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
Did Christmas just come early?
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
I've done my first collection! It's simple and easy to create. I like it - Tnx to all the staff!
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
Like the new layouts, but I can't decide on what to choose ^_^
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
Another surprise tonight: I can choose the layout of my photo page! Great!
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
Only one tiny thing I would suggest to change:
On my logged-in view of this page: flickr.com/photos/carowallis1/collections/72157594587017563/
It says 'Edit mosiac for this collection' instead of 'mosaic'.
Otherwise, it's all looks fun! Well done!
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
Caro Wallis edited this topic 16 months ago.
|
|
Yeah! Thank you! :)
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
Heh. Now let's have collections of favorites and collections of contacts next :)
Since this is a "pro" feature — what happens when a pro account expires? Will they disappear, and then return when the "pro" is renewed, as usual?
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
"Mosiac" typo fixed (will roll out later), thanks :-)
@MLM: Yup, just like sets.
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
Hurrah! Thanks!!
'nuff said. :-D
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
Fabulous stuff - I find the medium photos look best with horizontal images.
But that's me being anal! Thanks for the sparkly new features, guys!
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
Caro Wallis edited this topic 16 months ago.
|
|
Can a collection contain both collections and sets?
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
The images in the small size mosaic on my main page are too small to see. I'd rather have fewer than 12 images and be able to see them beyond a vague sense of greenness or brownness.
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
wowsers! the new layout options is way bigger news than collections :D
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
First of all, thanks for the new tool ! Now, the bugs ;-)
The mosaic creator doesn't seem to work properly, the drag & drop is capricious, especially for the last row and when using individual photos from sets. Haven't been able to crate a proper mosaic yet.
Also, the first mosaic, automatically generated, seems to use the "front" photo of each set contained in the collection BUT only for the first 4 sets (after that, it keeps on using photos from within that 4th set, instead of using the front photo of each subsequent set).
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
thank you! thank you! thank you! thank you! thank you! thank you! thank you! thank you!
is it me but when i try to randomize the mosaic most of the pics are coming from a few certain sets only.
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
Little Dragon edited this topic 16 months ago.
|
|
With the medium sized pictures as a chosen layout -
Losing the line breaks makes it look annoying (as someone with a lot of text in their descriptions)
I can't see hyperlinks in my photo descriptions on the front page, but others can, is that right? Maybe to stop that thing where you click on them and then sort of edit at the same time?
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
Absolutely brilliant - Using them already!
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
It doesn't seem that visitors to your stream can see the collections link.
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
Dragging from bottom row into a mosaic not only doesn't work with Firefox 1.5.0.4, not more than a few times anyway, it causes mosaic rearrangement to fail too after I give up. Sometimes the thumbnail I am trying to move is a few hundred pixels above its correct location and the location of my mouse.
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
I see your collections link beebo.
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
ive created a few collections, but when i click on any of them (example) they are empty - but do have sets in them when i view in organiser.
i am presuming there a slight lag time cos everyone is experimenting :)
edit: yeah, all is fine now. there was indeed a slight lag :)
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
I'm looking into the drag and drop problems with mosaics. Please feel free to point to this comment if more people report it :)
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
HTML entered into the collection description doesn't render as HTML.
However, if I then edit the description on the collection page and save, the HTML works. Leaving the page and returning causes the HTML tags to be displayed as text again.
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
1541, I can see 17 sets in that link.
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
yeah brenda - all is fine, i updated with an edit just after i posted :)
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
Only had one or two problems with the mosaics. A few times the thumbnail refused to stay in the mosaic box. Otherwise great. Using Firefox 2.0.0.2
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
firstly, thank you! (no sleep for me tonight)
How about view counters for collections?
Commenting on collections?
Favouriting collections?
ps the layout option is very cool too.
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
Thank you
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
Great feature but I think I could happily do without the grey stripe behind the sets & the single line above the first image.
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
A request for layout options: Both collections AND sets in the right column. For example, I might want to put the two latest chronological sets (two different events) at the top, followed by three themed sets (say, "flowers," "food," and "live music"), and then collections (of sets and "loose photos") for 2007, 2006, 2005, etc.
Maybe you could add a "Layout" tab to Organizr for ordering the right column? This order could be different than the regular set ordering/collection ordering, which are currently separate.
It seems to work pretty well for me otherwise, though!
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
Ugly, ugly. ugly. grey stripe.
I'm calling Kofi Annan, he'll make you get rid of it!
:)
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
Eric,
From what I can see testing it out just now, you can only add a collection to another collection AT THE TIME OF CREATION of the collection.
So, if I say, Create new Collection... then I can drag an existing collection from the list below it into the new collection.
BUT, if it's an existing collection, there appears to be no way to drag another existing collection to it.
Is this right? Can you clarify?
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
actually - i am having a problem...
in firefox where i am logged in with this flickr account i see that this collection has two sets. (firefox 2,002)
in safari (logged in with a different flickr account) the same link above shows just the title "2007 travel" but no sets :(
(using mac with everything up todate)
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
in the FAQ, part of the answer to, "How are the random images chosen for my collection mosaic?" reads In fact, if the photo contains even one single public photo, we will only use public photos to build the mosaic.
is that first 'photo' supposed to be set? or collection? the whole answer to that Q is a bit murky, but i haven't had a play with collections yet so maybe i'll figure it out.
and thanks, it's been a while coming but should be an awesome feature!
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
 I can see the same 2 sets... once logged in with this account on FF2.0 and also when logged into my other account on Safari.
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
Brenda Anderson: any given collections can only contain collections or sets. If it already contains sets, you can't add collections into it. If it contains collections, you can't drag sets into it. So, it isn't set at the time of creation, but when you drag the first thing into it. (If you drag all sets out of a collection, you can then drag collections into that same collection.)
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
i'm probably just missing something... but, i changed my layout and now i can't see how to change it again... help?
edit: i found my way... nevermind me.
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
eshu edited this topic 16 months ago.
|
|
|
brenda: still not showing up for me in safari - the main photo page says that the collection has two sets, but when i click on it its still empty... it will probably sort itself out over night. *kicks safari*
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
Lovely! Great stuff! Woohoo! Thanks flickroos!
The earlier reported set dragging problem with Firefox 1.5 is also true for firefox 2.0. The Mosaic maker also covers up the picture findr on a browser window that covers most of a 1024x768 screen, so it's hard to see what is there..
Didn't there used to be a place to edit set details from within the organizr? I must be going blind cuz I can't find it any more.
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
BenODen edited this topic 16 months ago.
|
|
|
 That explains it. Can you add that to the FAQ?
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
thomask: it should read "collection", and it's been fixed. Thanks for spotting that.
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
I wanted to mix sets and collections in a set, putting the more interesting sets at top level within a collection and the less interesting sets in a subdirectory (subcollection).
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
It would be nice to be able to have more than 5 medium sized shots on the front page.
I'm not complaining, just an idea =)
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
Liz: You change your layout in your account settings
www.flickr.com/account/prefs/layout/
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
thanks David... i'm just gonna go now...
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
There are still things that I'm not sure I understand but I loooooove it!
Thanks flickr staff! :o)
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
I'm with others here, the medium-sized image layout is cool, but it shows too much text from the descriptions, and the text is ugly with no line breaks or html or links. With larger descriptions the text ends up dominating the photo page, when with medium-sized photos it should be the images that take over the page.
Would really like to see that go back to the first one two lines of the description, then a "..." or whatever.
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
Je pose ma question en français, car j'ai de la difficulté à comprendre en anglais sur ce sujet... Qu'est-ce que c'est que cette nouvelle fonction COLLECTIONS ? Et à quoi ça sert ?
Merci
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
This is a very good day!!!
I started to be a bit confused by my 89 sets....I will have to work next day!
GREAT FEATURE!! :-)
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
Paolo C. edited this topic 16 months ago.
|
|
Thank you :) You are great.
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
It's a good start.
But for me, the point of calling "sets of sets" in the past was that I had in mind that you could choose to have sets, as well as sets of sets in the set. See, it's equally confusing to read.
And the layout option is great, but then again we're not quite there. I like to keep my newly created sets at the top, but I would then like to have my collections placed after a couple of those sets. So now I'm torn between "advertising" a new set, or making browsing user-friendly. sniffle.
It would also have been nice, when viewing a photo, to be able to quickly spot that this photo is part of a collection, just like we can quickly spot that the photo is part of other sets.
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
Minor typo:
When creating a mosaic for an empty collection, it says
"You must first drag collections or sets into this collection! You can't build an mosaic for a collection that does not have any sets in it."
That should be "a mosaic", not "an"
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
Will you be adding an easy way to grab the HTML for a link to the collection that includes the mosaic image? Have I just missed it?
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
Thank you!
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
When creating a collections mosaic, there is the option: "Replacement images can be dragged up from the findr below." although, the way it's set up, the mosaic window hides most of the pictures, making it difficult to drag them up.
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
Selecting a customised layout of medium images changes the first page of my photos, but not the subsequent pages (all small images). Is this the intention?
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
If you make the collection title to long the "edit mosaic" disappears beneath the collection below it. www.flickr.com/photos/magicfoundry/
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
"It would also have been nice, when viewing a photo, to be able to quickly spot that this photo is part of a collection.."
That does seem to be a break from the Flickr user interface (that I love). Literally every element of a photostream is only a single click away; every image tells me what set it's in, and is a single click away from that set or the photostream. But images have no direct navigation to the Collection that they're in (or collections, as the case may be) so when I'm looking at an image, I can't navigate to its collection(s), only to it's set(s) or photostream.
it makes me feel like the Collections are a navigational branch, a side-alley in a way. I dunno I'm not really describing this right, but instinctively I'm getting a strange vibe so far. will continue to play.
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
Hm. I would have preferred if the page layout had been an option of the viewer. Now we have small photos here, medium photos there, sets here, no sets there, and if there are no sets on the stream page we have to head over tho the sets page to see if there are really no sets at all or if they just aren't displayed. *sigh*
And I don't think I like the "medium size" flavor of the stream. There are only 5 photos where there used to be 18 before! Far too few, and too much wasted white space between them. Fortunately this affects the first page only … phew. I was afraid at first that the entire photostream would be broken up into pages of 5 photos each. But at least there should be a link on the photo page to switch the view back to the "classic" layout, just like we can switch search results between "detail" and "thumbnail" views. A thumbnail view of the stream with more photos per page would be even better.
And I'm with Mark & The Zebra — the grey background pulls the attention away from the photos to the set thumbnails. Can that be a bit less bold? Or maybe the photos should be on gray and the set thumbnails on white, that would be less distracting (I think).
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
I would rather not have a link on each photo to the collection(s) it is in. That, to me, would be too cluttered. If you are looking at a photo and see that it's in a set, you can click on the set. On the set page, it then shows you at the top, all the collections that set is in.
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
Is there a way to convert an existing set into a collection, and break the photos in that set down into smaller sets? I already have a set called Critters, but it would be good to be able to make separate groupings of (say) Birds, Reptiles and Mammals within the existing set.
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
 I would have preferred if the page layout had been an option of the viewer.
Yes, this would be good. Or, a button to switch views would be good, as you mentioned.
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
eww! photos NOT on gray, please. I'm ambivalent about the gray bar for sets, in some ways it may actually help frame the photo space. but NOT under the photos, please.
[I can see how this is going, we already all want different things. glad I'm not a Flickr staffer!.I also would not want the viewer to be given the choice of view. Some of the options hurt my eyes, I wouldn't want the images to be presented that way.
brenda: I don't want more crap on the sidebar of the photo page, either. But at least how that folder-like linking is on the sets, why can't that be present on the photo page as well:
The Searcher > Collections> Art
Then it maintains a unified structure for the site. Right now it feels like a branch (right down to the layout choices) either I navigate via sets, or I navigate via collections. and if I get to an image, I no longer have the choice of navigating via collections, except by travelling through sets. I just want one more link to close the loop. I think. still working on it.]
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
The Searcher edited this topic 16 months ago.
|
|
I was able to modify the mosaic for my first 3 collections, but I was getting the same "thumb appears at top of window" bug for the last collection I made. I'm using Firefox 2.0.0.2 on OS X 10.4.8 (Intel).
Also, I wish there was a way to show both collections and sets on my pages? I'd like to not have to put everything into collections and still have "orphan" sets show up in the sidebar.
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
Yippee, wowie-ka-zowie! Cobalt's going to get no sleep tonight! Woohoo! Thanks, flickr staff!
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
 a way to convert an existing set into a collection, and break the photos in that set down into smaller sets?
Someone asked this in the utata group, and Stewart said, "you can't. Collections are designed more to organize sets when you have a lot of them, so no splitting. "
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
Logging in using my second account I can't see any of the sets in my collections.
www.flickr.com/photos/lwr/collections/
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
They grey stripe HAS to go... ugly ugly ugly... I love collections though. Ohh and you should definitely increase the size of small thumbnails just a tad.
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
 I can see all your sets fine.
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
[shits self]
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
Thanks for checking, Brenda. I wonder why I can't ??
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
In "medium" view I see only the left half of the photos. Shouldn't that be .StreamView { width: 500px; } for the medium sized photos in the CSS file, rather than
.StreamView { width: 250px; } ?
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
From the FAQ:
First, go to the Organizr. Under the Sets and Collections tab, you'll see a link to create a new collection.
There is nothing under Sets and Collections tab. The Sets and Collections just don't load in the Organizr. It did earlier, but after I made some collections, not anymore.
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
I'd like to able to add a photo to a set that's in a collection by just dragging and dropping in the left pane in "Sets and Collections" tab.
Does that make sense? Not sure I explained it well enough.
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
Haven't tried it yet. Think I'll wait 'til the kinks are ironed out.
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
elementalPaul edited this topic 16 months ago.
|
|
|
I created my first collection ( flickr.com/photos/cobalt/collections/72157594587200439/ )
and it went well. I was not able to drag the initial images around in the mosaic at all. I was not able to initially drag new images into the mosaic from the original mosaic shown. However, I was able to "save" the mosaic and when I called it up from the "Edit collection" link from the collection, then I could drag and drop images from the sets into the mosaic.
I have great hopes for how I can use this feature. Thank you again, flickr staff!
PS. I merged my account today with a flickr ID and lo-and-behold it WORKED! Woohoo! Woohoo again!
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
Drag and drop didnt work to the mosaic on IE6, from bottom set bar....... opening the collection the written header text is muddled at top and type size is small compared to set type size, which is great.
Mosaic display on page should be bigger than standard set size, kinda defeats the draw user in purpose if no image can be identified.
Few bugs to iron out it seems but beyond expectations in concept and very user friendly....big bravo!!!
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
I don't mean to be a naysayer here. But I was hoping for something a little easier. Now instead of just keeping track of sets of which I have hundreds, I have to keep track of two things collections and sets. I was hoping to divide each set into digital and film, now I have to create double the amount of sets anyway to put in a collection and try and make sure I get all those sets in the correct collection. Then keep track of the photos I add to each set. Do you understand what I mean?
I create a collection of my coin sets, I have maybe 40+ sets, but the sets just don't disappear into the collection like they would in say a folder in windows, so I could accidentally and very easily forget to add a set to this collection and not realize it for months or years.
It's a nice idea, but makes organization for someone like me much more complicated and difficult. Thanks for the thought though.
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
I couldn't manage to drag and drop pictures from the findr to the mosaic, the pictures I drag always fall back down and don't stay in the mosaic although I selected the set I want to drag from in the mosaic dialog. Perhaps a little bug? Or does it work for others?
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
First: thank you! I've been hoping for collections for quite awhile and am very happy to see you guys have put so much work into this. Of course, that means I have a few suggestions ;)
It would be wonderful if you could add stray photos to a collection. Ideally, collections should be able to contain other collections, sets or photos at the same level. As Tiffibunny says, right now I'm actually making more sets to add a "misc" set into a collection.
For example: I've created a "Travel in the US" collection. Within that, I have quite a few sets such as "Grand Canyon", "Baltimore", etc. But, I've been to NY and DC quite a few times, so I'd also like to be able to put collections those trips on the same "level" as the single sets. And then - any left over pictures could be dropped into the main collection.Does that make any sense?
Again, not trying to complain, just thinking of ways to make a good thing even better.
@limone: sometimes it works for me, sometimes it doesn't. I think it gets "tired" after awhile. ;)
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
amazing tool !!!!!
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
I must compliment flickr for the new page layout options. Bravo!
As for collections, we'll see. :-)
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
What I found interesting was that when I clicked on your "Flora" collection I came across house renovations. Weird or what? Oh! And Kids?
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
Danny O'Brien edited this topic 16 months ago.
|
|
Oh thanks!!! wow! What a happy surprise!
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
"I'd like to able to add a photo to a set that's in a collection by just dragging and dropping in the left pane in "Sets and Collections" tab."
Me too. I was disappointed when that didn't work.
As an alternative I would like to open just a collection's worth of sets in the organizer as potential targets so I don't have to deal with the obnoxious "scroll and drop your photos in the wrong set" feature that kicks in if I don't carefully center the target set in the middle of the window. (That "feature" of scrolling when you go near the edge has never done anything useful for me and has caused me a lot of annoyance.)
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
collections doesn't work for me can't drag and drop,
plus in the organzir i can't see the images in the bottom row, don't know why...always have to count the images in order to know which one is which....but te idea is great!
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
The number of photos under the set title (on the main index page) is not centered properly on Safari or Firefox on the Mac.
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
There should be an option "Add to collection" in the menu bar on the set page, just like there is an option "Add to set" on the photo page.
Will there be a flickr.collections API?
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
At last :o)
Thanks - now I'm waiting for the possibility to have black background ;o)
Big hugs for the collections
/Ola
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
yay!
and thanks for the page layout options, too!
but... but... sorry to immediately start whingeing, but... please can we have the option of *one* column of *small* photos on the first page? the two-column layout has been driving me nuts since it was introduced, so I instantly went for the one-column medium version, but the medium photos are way too big and "in your face" for an overview page.
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
a guest pass on a collection would be great.
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
Fantastic job Flickr folks.
Clean, elegant, easy to figure out, and very well designed.
Thumbs up.
---
please can we have the option of *one* column of *small* photos on the first page?
If you ever get a chance to do this, I'd really dig it. Larger would be sweet.
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
Larger would be sweet.
You can do medium-size on your front page now, in case you missed it. Change your layout here.
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
I started deleting some of my sets that were in collections in order to re-organize some stuff. Now, when I go to Organize -> Sets & Collections, nothing happens. No sets or collections come up at all. I can't edit them or create new ones or view the ones that are still there,
Houston, we have a problem. ;)
Posted 16 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
