Trendy wireless internet café in Damascus, Syria
To take full advantage of Flickr, you should use a JavaScript-enabled browser and
install the latest version of the Macromedia Flash Player .
...As long as you don't mind several waiters constantly hovering over you, micro-managing the arrangement of all items on the table, and reading everything on your laptop screen. And as long as you can get by with zero English. Good food and music (although only Western). Best to come in the morning or early afternoon, before the house gets packed. This place is just one block west of the statue of Hafez al-Assad (see my adjacent photo here).
Comments
Fun colors and reflections on the cybercafe.
Thanks for sharing with Creative Commons. I
used a crop of this image with an article on Internet extremism .
Posted 6 months ago.
( permalink
)
Thanks for taking the time to let me know
about the reproduction of
my cyber-cafe image -- to which of course
you're totally welcome --
and sharing the link to your article. You
have an interesting web
site. I'd like to offer a challenge to
some of your information and
conclusions. As a US citizen who's lived
and worked for most of a
year in Syria and the occupied Palestinian
territories, I see a
troubling degree of fallacy in the dominant
view of our mainstream
media and foreign policy toward this
region, which I think your
article reflects relatively uncritically.
I regularly follow news of the current
Assad government and I
disagree with our government's labeling of
Syria as a "leading state
sponsor of terror," which your article
reports but provides no
countervailing quotes of dissent. I also
think it's potentially
misleading to associate an image of an
upscale social hub in an open,
international city with the closed-minded
extremism of anti-Western
vigilantes based in places that are far
more politically charged,
such as Lahore or London, where such public
connectivity really DOES
get used for nefarious purposes.
Damascenes are overwhelmingly pro-
Western and care much more about stylish
cars, clothes and
comfortable living than they do about
politics. Everyone so far has
been delighted to receive American visitors
and could not care less
about how I'll vote in 2008.
You cite Syria as a regime that
"strictly censors online content,"
which just isn't true. I spend a lot of
time here online, and I've
never encountered any censorship. The
current president was a
Britain-educated I.T. CEO, and his
administration was actually the
first to legalize and promote internet use.
Beginning in 2000,
residential broadband and cheap cyber-cafes
have proliferated
exponentially.
You also mention the State Department's
work against terrorist
ideologies online. As a student of Arabic
language I'm troubled by
your misleading oversimplification of the
program's target blogs as
"Arabic-language blogs,"
suggesting that anything in Arabic is de
facto suspicious content. While you
personally may not be jumping to
the conclusion that an entire people of a
native tongue should be
held suspect and scrutinized, you're
leading readers to do just
that. This leads to the very same
polarization and radicalization
among ordinary Westerners that we spend so
much time and money trying
to squash in the Middle East.
In my time here, I've had the opportunity
to meet and dialogue with a
variety of refugees from Iraq, Lebanon, and
Palestine, seeking a new
beginning in neighboring Syria after their
homes and communities
became "collateral damage" in
US-led or US-funded campaigns against
their leaders or against militant groups
based nearby. I can't think
of a better word to describe these people's
feelings than
"terrorized." Consequently, I
see no state higher on that list than
our very own.
I agree that the basic human activity of
joining groups can either
serve to broaden or narrow one's
perspectives. When individuals
receive inspiration to question their own
assumptions and ask honest
questions, they become effective agents
against intolerance. I
believe education is always the key. I
don't agree that ongoing
globalization of the internet either
promotes or discourages "an
increased tolerance of violence."
People will always find an
available medium for forming groups and for
trying to understand
their world, for better or for worse. As
long as we've been human,
there always were and there will always be
alternatives. In the days
before online child-porn rings, there were
amateur child-porn magazines.
Thanks for your attention.
Best regards,
-Josh
Posted 5 months ago.
( permalink
)
Josh,
Thanks for posting your email to me here as
well. I share your concerns about the fact
that terror is a two-way street under the
Bush Administration, continuing America's
history of dubious military engagements. The
death toll resulting from the Iraq War is on
par with the handiwork of violent dictators.
I agree that the phrase
"Arabic-language blogs" is
unfortunately vague, but the article's author
informs me that in her research she couldn't
find anything more specific from the State
Department. The fact that the State Dept.
bloggers disclose their identities and
professional affiliation is, I'd say, a sign
that they are sensitive to the ethics of
Internet behavior. I don't think our phrasing
is slanted or would lead readers to conclude
that all Arabic blogs are suspect. It seems
generic to me, along the lines of saying Al
Jazeera editors read the English-language
press.
As for Syria being a country that
"strictly censors online content,"
I'll admit that the adverb is probably not
ideal. But Syria does not allow total press
freedom. Bloggers have been arrested in
recent years. Freedom House, Human Rights
Watch, and Global Voices Online all have
coverage of this topic.
With kind wishes for your safety and
support for your work in the Middle East,
Evan
Posted 5 months ago.
( permalink
)
Would you like to comment?
Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).
This photo also belongs to:
Additional Information
Some rights reserved
Anyone can see this photo