2008_366090 - Brandenburg Tribute
To take full advantage of Flickr, you should use a JavaScript-enabled browser and
install the latest version of the Macromedia Flash Player .
366 Day 90: Today is a landmark in that we are one quarter (in round terms) through the 366 project for 2008.
I thought it would be appropriate today to pay tribute to what I believe to be the father of all such projects, though it lasted just 90 days, just as far as we have come. Nature photographer Jim Brandenburg took himself off to the North Woods of Minnesota for 90 days. He writes:
"I had set myself a challenge: that for ninety days between the autumnal equinoxe and winter solstice I would make only one photograph a day . There would be no second exposure, no second chance. My work would be stripped to the bones, bringing together whatever photographic and woods skills I have. My quest would be both arbitrary and rigid. Arbitrary in that no one had compelled me, or even asked me, to do it. Rigid in that, once engaged, the constraints I had chosen would force me to examine my art, and the wild and isolated place in which I live in a manner I'd never before attempted. [I knew that] success would depend not upon any single and magnificent image, but on a tapestry woven of furtive glances. " (My emphasis)
The result was a book "Chased by the Light" and all 90 images published in National Geographic in November 1997.
I was incredibly moved by the piece and the book, as I was taken on a daily journey through quiet woods and wilderness lakes, observing life (and death), hearing the crack of undergrowth beneath the feet and the call of loons, and feeling the creeping chill of the onset of winter. As a journey of photographic (and personal) self-discovery I have encountered no equal.
When first invited to join 366, I wondered if I would be able to do the same - make just one exposure per day - but I realised that it would take an immersion in my surroundings of a kind that is not possible in daily life.
So 366 is where I am. 90 days in and moving on, weaving in a different way my own "tapestry of furtive glances". I hope you'll be inspired to look out the article and the book. Jim Brandenburg remains in my top ten of all-time photography influences ...
References:
Brandenburg J. (1997),
Chased by the Light , NorthWord Press, Minnesota
National Geographic (1997),
North Woods Journal , Vol 192 No.5, pp 94-111
www.jimbrandenburg.com/
flickr.com/photos/thegreatsunra/149296884/
Comments
Thanks for sharing this story. interesting.
that takes a lot of discipline not to take
more than one exposure or composition; it
also takes a lot of talent to get it right
the first time.
Posted 5 months ago.
( permalink
)
I'm probably going to offend someone, but
anyway...
I believe that no matter how good a
photographer is, he or she can not predict
the best light or the best moment of the day.
To arbitrarily limit oneself to 1 photo a day
is an experience in self restraint (and
perhaps a bit self-indulgent), and will not
yield the most powerful story of a 90 day
sojourn. Why not take 2 photos a day, or 10,
or 100? The photo essay could have been
stronger with that approach, as the photos
could have been edited to impart his feelings
and experience.
Can you imagine what must have gone through
Jim's mind when he was considering the shot?
Should I or shouldn't I? What an unnecessary
conundrum! What an interference with good
photography and an enjoyment of the
adventure! Did he feel the disappointment
later in the day when better light presented
itself?
So thank you Ken for posting this. I see
your are not so uptight about the limits, and
that is a relief. Keep up the good work!
Rebuttals encouraged...
Posted 5 months ago.
( permalink
)
I could not be that disciplined - just one a
day. It would drive me mad.
There have been very few days so far this
year where I have only taken one image, and
that was due to constraints out of my
control, rather than factors within it!
Needless to say, the single image days
haven't been very inspired...
--
Seen next to a fellow photo of 366 2008. (? )
Posted 5 months ago.
( permalink
)
Yes. As I've noted previously - unlike
Ken, who generally uses the first photo he
takes, I tend to find mine improve as I find
better angles and I more often use the last
one of a sequence. Taking only one wouldn't
really suit me.
Nevertheless, I have to admire the skill
and judgement of the man who can get it right
first time!
Looks like a book well worth getting.
--
Seen next to a fellow photo of 366 2008. (? )
Posted 5 months ago.
( permalink
)
Just one a day? There is no way I could do
that, I admire someone that can, but I also
agree with agrinberg that "Should I or
shouldn't I?seems an unnecessary conundrum!
(in the digital age anyway)"
It reminds me of the days when I had a film
camera and I had just one roll of film on a
dive, then I would stop before taking a photo
as there would be no changing the film whilst
underwater. There were often times when I
wouldn't take the shot to conserve film only
to see less towards the end of the dive and
wish I have taken the photo before. Although
on many occasions I ran out of film before
the end of the dive too!
Posted 5 months ago.
( permalink
)
Very interesting thoughts, everybody, thank
you for taking the time to consider this so
carefully.
There certainly have been times when I have
been shooting in the mountains, when wave
after wave of light has passed through, and I
have been thrilled by the flow experience of
making picture after picture. Burdened with
being able to make just one picture I'd have
cried. And I agree, Alan, that it would
neither have represented the day, nor been
the best image I could have got, at least by
normal reckoning.
Sarah I recall being in a similar situation
on a mountain summit with a magnificent
inversion. I realised I had left all my spare
film in the car, and had to make do with one
roll of 20; it certainly sharpened my
awareness. And like Erasmus, I too find in
exploring one subject that things often
improve the more I play.
On 366 I have often used the first picture
I made, but I have only been discovering
that on the project, and it does also begin
to explain to me what Jim's approach is all
about.
It all becomes clearer on reading Jim's
writing: he was disillusioned with shooting
300 rolls for a Geographic assignment; He had
studied in Japan and was interested in Zen
and some aspects of self-suffering. This was
a deliberate experiment, a retreat, to see
what happened, "to examine his art"
but also to reconnect with nature in the
present moment.
I understand that. Listening to feelings,
trusting intuitions, delaying gratification,
recognising and grasping THE moment, not
regretting missed opportunities, being aware
of frustrations: all human challenges to be
overcome on such a task; hence my reading of
it as a personal discovery perhaps more than
a photographic one.
And that is where it would have remained
for me - purely an intra-personal exercise -
had the quality of the photographs not been
so superb. Each and every one is full of soul
and vitality. If there were better images to
be made on each day then only Jim would know.
But it obviously worked for him, because he
went back to repeat it through a summer.
It remains an approach I might try for a
short time ... just to see what happens.
Posted 5 months ago.
( permalink
)
I agree, a self imposed precept or rule is
more of a personal exercise and not meant to
please the mainstream, and I give him kudos
for that.
--
Seen in my contacts' photos. (? )
Posted 5 months ago.
( permalink
)
Certainly Michael, as these comments suggest,
such a method is not for everyone. But I
always hope that images transcend the
photographer's technique or philosophy, and
Jim Brandenburg's images definitely would
please the mainstream I think.
Posted 5 months ago.
( permalink
)
Interesting discussion. What I'd like to
contribute is probably going to come out very
garbled, but I hope some of it might make
sense.
I suppose I would agree with many of the
views here -- that limiting myself to a
single photograph in a day would be a hard
rule for me to keep -- and in fact, I'm not
sure how helpful I would find it either.
However, since I became seriously
interested in photography nine months ago, I
have become aware that the process and effort
of capturing the picture very often
interferes with my ability to simply enjoy
the moment. Having a camera in my hands
makes me an observer, rather than a
participant, even if just for the short
moment it takes to press the shutter. And it
never *is* just a moment, is it? We take
time to look, to frame the picture, to
consider the rules of good composition, to
make sure the exposure is set properly, etc,
etc. All of these processes interfere with
our ability to just *be* in the moment.
Some might say that having the photograph
enables you to enjoy the moment -- or rather,
the memory of it -- over and over again.
However, the memory is not the same as the
experience would have been if you had been in
the midst of it.
So, I can understand and appreciate what
Jim Brandenburg was trying to do. If you
want to use your photographs to communicate
something about life, or your experience, or
the way you felt when you saw something -- it
doesn't matter much whether you miss the
perfect light and wonderful shot from this
morning in favour of waiting to take a shot
later in the day, because life carries on.
And you can try to communicate that bit of
life or that feeling by capturing something
else later. A photograph which is full of
life and feeling is very different to me than
one which is perfectly composed, perfectly
exposed, perfectly processed, but which is
merely an exercise in technique. Beauty is
all around us. If we don't capture it in the
morning, we can capture it in another way in
the afternoon.
Oh dear, I think I've lost the thread of
where I was going with that. But just wanted
to say that, yes, I think I can understand
something of what Brandenburg was attempting
to do, and my own decision not to take lots
and lots of shots of the same subject in a
single session, at different angles, and
different focal lengths, so that I can go
home and pick the best one to post on flickr
-- that decision is, in some small way, about
not allowing myself to go through life as an
observer. (Having said that, I do sometimes
take two or three shots of a subject in a
session, and of course, I always pick the
best one to post on flickr!)
Hmm. Sorry for this long message, Ken. I
think I'll stop there. :-)
Posted 5 months ago.
( permalink
)
Thanks Dawn. I don't think your contribution
is garbled at all, in fact it makes a lot of
sense and I think gets to the heart of what
Jim Brandenburg was exploring ...
Posted 5 months ago.
( permalink
)
I did a variation on this. I went to a local
prairie restoration park and tried to get at
least one shot of something I'd never
photographed before every time I went for a
walk there. It definitely was a tool to make
me look closely at everything. I finally
failed to find something new only when it was
almost winter.
Posted 5 months ago.
( permalink
)
Would you like to comment?
Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).
This photo also belongs to:
Additional Information
All rights reserved
Anyone can see this photo