Share
(101 to 200 of 2588 replies)
alike writer [deleted] 9:44pm, 3 October 2006
Perhaps I'm being overly observant and kind of picky, but today I've noticed quite a few non-self portatits, and a couple of those aren't current.
2 4 5 6 7 ••• 25 26
(101 to 200 of 2588 replies)
another floater.
www.flickr.com/photos/victoriafrigerio/213059496/in/pool-...

no 365 images in stream, no 365 tags in stream.
awake rhythm [deleted] 15 years ago
let's get our definitions strait.
or at least a little bit more informed.
it is all too easy to forget that cultural values and perceptions are not facts.
this is a GLOBAL forum.

from the main page:

"This group is for self portraits. We're intentionally leaving the term loosely defined. Does your head or face need to be in the picture? Can it be any part of your body? Can other people be in the picture with you? You can use tripods or timers or whatever. We're leaving all of that up to you. But please don't post pictures that you aren't in. It should be a picture of you, taken by you. That's the whole point of this group. There are tons of groups on flickr for other types of photography, please try to keep this one on topic."

Wikipedia definition of the term 'you'
dictionary.reference.com/browse/you
Wikipedia definition of 'self'
dictionary.reference.com/browse/self
admin
chrismaverick 15 years ago
the victoriafrigerio picture has been removed as it doesn't seem either of the people in the photo are her (as far as I can tell)

As for the definitions, my intent for this group has always been that it is a daily self portrait group. You must appear in the photos in some way. Reflections and shadows are allowable. Other aspects of you, while possibly quite representative of your personality, are not really arguable as self portraits and therefore are not intended to count (though I have allowed a few people leeway here since they were clearly trying to follow the base concept of the group).

I have always wanted this group to be freeform and more about the interpretation of each individual for his/herself, but if I allowed just any picture to be here, the group would simple degnerate into a random photo group and in my view, the dedicated purpose is what keeps it special.
Travelinjim 15 years ago
Amen Maverick. BTW, you're doing a good job and your concept of a group, even if you borrowed it from someone else :) is still great.

As if you needed me to tell you you're doing a good job.
Rockin' Rob Posted 15 years ago. Edited by Rockin' Rob (member) 15 years ago
Here's one. I don't see any way that the photographer could possibly be in this one.
www.flickr.com/photos/gfly9/284504861/in/pool-365days/

Oops... I was thinking it was hanging on a wall or something. my bad!
admin
chrismaverick 15 years ago
Ummm, isn't that just a person wearing a necklace? I would imagine the photographer is the entire background.
Travelinjim 15 years ago
admin
chrismaverick 15 years ago
Jim,

those are fine... they're for two different days.
Travelinjim 15 years ago
Yeah, but is that her in the photos? Maybe I'm missing something there.
MOD
pi c's 15 years ago
Jim's right Mav...these are not "self portraits" I mean, she even mentions it in the description...but they're not "her". I'm leaving this up to you...but they don't belong in the group pool.
admin
chrismaverick Posted 15 years ago. Edited by chrismaverick (admin) 15 years ago
you're right. I hadn't even noticed. I have deleted them and warned her. (I totally never expected that this group would get so big that I wasn't even aware of the gender of all the members)
Travelinjim 15 years ago
I was starting to wonder if she was a "Master of Disguise!"
TheBon 15 years ago
I think we've got a multiple poster here:
www.flickr.com/photos/bre/284932390/in/pool-365days/
admin
chrismaverick 15 years ago
He has been asked to remove one. Thank you.
metró 15 years ago
his titles say they're different days, but they were all taken on the same day and uploaded on the same day, so i'm not sure...

www.flickr.com/photos/horselatitudes/285437685/in/pool-36...

www.flickr.com/photos/horselatitudes/285437784/in/pool-36...

www.flickr.com/photos/horselatitudes/285437751/in/pool-36...
ambrosialove 15 years ago
Haha - at least this last dude tried to pretend they were different days.
admin
chrismaverick 15 years ago
eh... I'm so not going to get into whether or not timestamps are right. Maybe they are from different days. Maybe not. If he is cheating he's only cheating himself.
d.rex 15 years ago
metró 15 years ago
metró 15 years ago
admin
chrismaverick 15 years ago
thanx.
ambrosialove 15 years ago
can somebody make a desk group please?

www.flickr.com/photos/jennr073/286435069/in/pool-365days/
MOD
pi c's 15 years ago
this one was removed...
mav...i didn't leave another note b/c ambrosialove left one in the comments section. it clearly didn't belong so i just removed it...please let me know if i should refrain from that in the future :) just trying to help you when i can.
admin
chrismaverick 15 years ago
No, its perfectly fine by me... less work for me. Thanx
puzzled guitar [deleted] 15 years ago
MOD
pi c's 15 years ago
yes, i actually left him a message in the comments section, a few before yours, advising him that this wasn't in the spirit of the group. i will remove it now since i haven't heard from him.
*note, it may have been a self portrait, but it was taken in september and uploaded to flickr in sept. even if time stamp is wrong...the date uploaded to flickr is not...*
puzzled guitar [deleted] 15 years ago
yeah... i noticed your comment and just posted it as a reminder in case you were to forget in the wide world of flickr ;)
Travelinjim 15 years ago
flickr.com/photos/chare/288088059/
flickr.com/photos/chare/288083637/

Chare put two versions of day 3 in the pool.

"this will not do" ~ Pink Floyd
admin
chrismaverick 15 years ago
Thanx, Jim
d.rex 15 years ago
Can't imagine the photographer is in one of these cars...

www.flickr.com/photos/surrendo/252342964/in/pool-365days

...but maybe I'm missing something subtle?
admin
chrismaverick 15 years ago
got it. Thanx.
d.rex 15 years ago
admin
chrismaverick 15 years ago
removed. Since Sadandbeautiful had already warned him, I didn't bother. (thanx, Sarah)
TheBon 15 years ago
This one says it is from last year.
admin
chrismaverick 15 years ago
thank you
ambrosialove 15 years ago
www.flickr.com/photos/pjz/288740738/
www.flickr.com/photos/pjz/289196640/

Actually, you know what - just click on his set. There are too many for me to list here.
MOD
pi c's 15 years ago
thanks, i just sent him a message asking him to remove the cranberry bog from the pool. the 2nd photo, if you notice, is not even in the pool, simply in his 365 project set. i went through his set and his ideas are different than the group...which is why many of the ones that do not include him are not in the pool at all (like the ipod). i've left it up to him to remove the cranberry shot from the pool...
Travelinjim 15 years ago
And this young lady posted a few that were taken today.
www.flickr.com/photos/58585406@N00/289326465/
admin
chrismaverick 15 years ago
I'm torn on that... they're listed as different days even though they are all of the same day with the EXIF info. EXIF can lie. Also, we had a rule a while back where we were allowing people to post makeup pics for days when they missed a day or something like that (I've never done it myself).

So I'm not sure here what stance to take. Jen?
Wooble 15 years ago
Her previous 3 pictures were also all taken on the same day, and the rest of the EXIF tags look legit. Plus she's wearing the exact same pants and belt.

If I go back and fill in my missing days, then shoot the remaining 340-something pictures in the same day to finish in record time, at least I'll have the decency to change my clothes and look like I didn't take the pictures 5 minutes apart.
admin
chrismaverick 15 years ago
yeah, that's actually why I was kind of against the idea of fill in pictures back in the day. But we decided to allow it. Should I ever personally miss a day, I'll just be moving on and I'll have a missing day. *shrug*

I don't know that I want to penalize her specifically. But maybe we want to revisit the idea.
Travelinjim 15 years ago
Well, it's your group, so you're da boss. But, this is the part I just reread.

"Post one self portrait every day. No more than one post a day. That simple."

Of course, you can take as many as you want, you just post one. It keeps the pool manageable.
MOD
pi c's 15 years ago
I think a nice little flickr mail should be sent. I think that "filling in" days is something that, most of us agree, shouldn't be done. I do agree that we should not base things on "date taken" stamps because they have been known to be off. However, I didn't think EXIF data was off...if the user allows us to see that it should be accurate?
anyway, i think you should drop a little message, nicely of course as you always are, and let her know that she should choose one for "today" and she can provide links to her others if she chooses...or just keep them in her "set"...but I don't think that she should post a bunch all at once saying that they're different days when clearly they're not.
oh...but do i really care?! if it bothers me...i just don't comment on any of them.... jim's right in what the rules say....
Travelinjim 15 years ago
As a career military guy, I'm all about rules.
But, my human relations training tells me I should just let her express herself in whatever way she feels best, providing it doesn't cause harm to others or herself.

Ah, the great struggles that go on in my psyche!
fantastical quill [deleted] 15 years ago
I think the evidence is purely circumstantial, and I'd suggest not worrying about it.

The exif data is unreliable, she could have just worn the same belt two days in a row, she numbered the picture titles correctly, and the group permits 'fills' because people go on vacation or are otherwise unable to upload the day the photo's taken. I myself often take photos up until midnight, and then don't want to bother dealing with uploading, geotagging, and writing a description until the next morning.

Based on her personal set, she's sticking with the rules, which is much more than the 700 'phantom' members of the group are doing.
admin
chrismaverick 15 years ago
She has been (nicely) notified by email to stay within the bounds.

As for the vacation rule, the idea behind it is that you'd go on vacation and still take a pic of yourself every day and just post them when you get back. Not that you'd make up the days in one day.

Thank you everyone for your suggestions and your help with the floaters and generally being a part of the community. Keep up the good work.
fantastical quill [deleted] 15 years ago
Yes, I understand the vacation rule, expressed by my phrase "unable to upload the day the photo's taken". sorry if I wasn't clear enough.

I still must respectfully disagree with the notion that the dubious exif data warranted any sort of reprimand.
Wooble 15 years ago
Dubious EXIF data? Can you demonstrate any circumstances underwhich an EasyShare camera will add EXIF data to 2 pictures showing they were taken 6 minutes apart when they were actually taken a day apart? I doubt it. If the EXIF tags claimed one picture was taken in 1534 AD and the other was taken next week, I might buy the argument.
Travelinjim 15 years ago
As if I haven't already ticked off enough people tonight, I also just saw a new floater.

flickr.com/photos/beccaelena/290246417/in/pool-365days/
admin
chrismaverick 15 years ago
that one is definitely fine... there are fingers on the keyboard
ambrosialove 15 years ago
d.rex 15 years ago
I don't know if you try to filter these out or not. It doesn't seem that this person is really doing the 365 days project...just posts self portraits on occasion. Your call...it's a cool shot...

www.flickr.com/photos/victoriafrigerio/290985573
MOD
pi c's 15 years ago
elladog's photo doesn't seem to containt a photo of her NOW but it does show a picture of her from 8 years ago...not quite what the group is about but she posts fairly regularly so I've left it in...it's up to Mav on this one :D i didn't even leave a note for her.

@daverexwood... people can post at their leisure, even if they're not posting daily...it's their project and this was a self portrait taken today...so techically it's ok :D (I think)
admin
chrismaverick 15 years ago
victoriafrigerio is definitely in the clear. Sure, I'd love it if people posted every day, but she's no worse off than someone who misses one day, she just missed a bunch. I figure people do what they can.

elladog is a little trickier. My only rule was that you had to be in the picture. I never considered a picture of an old picture, but part of me wants to say that that's an interesting way of pushing the bounds creatively. This isn't the body image group where you're trying to track changes to yourself, its an attempt to represent yourself creatively. I figure its just as relavant as posting a drawing of yourself, or a shadow or a tiny reflection in a bottle on your desk or something. I'm inclined to allow it. I don't want this group to turn into a group full of people taking pictures of old pictures of themselves, but I don't want it to turn into a group full of sock or kiss pictures either. I don't think there's a big danger here. But yeah, its not what I had in mind.
fantastical quill [deleted] 15 years ago
In reply to wooble's comment above, I should first clarify that I was referring to the specific issue of the 'date taken' info that accompanies each flickr photo, and not the actual exif data itself. When I have uploaded things which I either scanned or converted formats of, then today's date is always going to be 'date taken' as well as 'date uploaded', and that's what I was thinking could have been the issue. I guess I played a little fast and loose with the terms I used.

My bad. Mea Culpa. A thousand pardons.

It doesn't change my basic point, though, which is that it seems some group rules are being rigidly enforced, while others are not, and I find it rather confusing.
admin
chrismaverick 15 years ago
not that I want this fight to go on longer. Because, really I don't want it to. But here's the basics.

1) EXIF data can be wrong. Various computer software screws it up all the time. Even Photoshop, the gold standard of photosoftware, will wipe the EXIF data sometimes when you save the file as a PSD or do crazy things with layers (which is why some of my photos have EXIF and other don't).

2) The "date taken" that flickr has, as far as I can tell takes the EXIF date if available and if not falls back to the file date and then, I guess probably the uploaded date comes next, but I can't really think of a situation when a file wouldn't have a file date. But whatever.

3) I didn't delete the user in question's photos. I sent her mail asking her if they were taken on different dates. She said they were. I took her at her word.

I'm not sure what rules you feel are too rigidly enforced or too ignored. For the most part I play everything pretty fast and loose. I only ever delete pictures when there's an absolutely clear violation of rules. Like a picture isn't of a person at all, and was merely posted to this group along with 50 others to increase comment count, or a picture is posted from a year ago or something. Even when someone posts multiple pictures for the same day (a violation), I don't delete a photo, I leave them a comment asking them to choose one and delete the other.

As I said elsewhere. It isn't my intention to be too strict with any of the rules. I want things to be fun here. And I want this community to be something I am proud of (for the record I am). But I had a vision of what it is we are building here, and I had to put some rules in place to make things make sense. What makes things interesting here is that we have a loose structure that we are all forced to work within. We're all solving the same artistic problem but in different creative ways. So what I attempt to do is enforce the rules enough so that the community works. So that we're something special and not just another flickr group but keep things free enough that really exciting work is produced.

Its a very fine line to walk.

I hope that answers your questions.
fantastical quill [deleted] 15 years ago
chris, I think the rules that confused me here, are that it's perfectly acceptable to miss a day completely, but it's unpardonable to miss a day and go back and fill it with a 'fake', or to take (and post) more than one photo per day. All of those rules are good ones, but I think that if rule numero uno were perhaps not so often dismissed, it would greatly benefit the overall quality of the pool.

Every time the matter of members who don't post comes up, it prompts 2 or 3 people to comment and explain why they haven't yet, but well over 700 people-as has been discussed recently- are still just lurking there and not doing or saying anything. It seems to have only become an issue because of the whole "Stalker" fear, but it's also a question of diluted quality. I was recently telling a friend about the group, and his first question was "How many people are doing this?" and I was at a loss to give him a clear answer.

I won't just complain without trying to offer a solution, though.

I've noticed that some groups have a multi-tiered membership level, so that there are the mods, as well as two different groups of members. What if we started a discussion thread much like the ones daverexwood did, in which we could post when we reach a certain level and then have a mod check our set, verify, and then 'promote' us to a secondary tier? It's nothing to do with quality or preference, of course, as the framework of 365 is straightforward enough that it doesn't have to be: Everyone can eventually become a 'second tier' member, but you have to actually play, and play by the rules.

Is this a crazy idea? I welcome feedback on it, as it honestly just now occured to me, and might have some flaws in it.
d.rex 15 years ago
pi c's/mav -- thanks for the clarification. -dave
Wooble 15 years ago
www.flickr.com/photos/locator/289780255/in/pool-365days/

is not a photo and

www.flickr.com/photos/locator/290365599/in/pool-365days/

is the same picture as the day before. pasted in front of a photo that's not a self portrait. with a statement that the user's personal 365 rules include "no editing".

I will need proof that the doodle from the previous day was actually drawn in black on a landscape and then photographed before I believe that one. But it still won't be a self-portrait.
MOD
pi c's 15 years ago
Left a kind comment on both of these photos asking a) is it a drawing of yourself and b) explaining the rules of the group, how they are very loose but what the basics are and that these photos do not follow. If I do not receive a reply in a comment section of his photos or in a message directly to me (or here)...I will remove them both from the pool.

Thanks!

To maproomsystems...i don't know about mav but that sounds like another part-time job to me. it's a nice suggestion but nothing i'm interested in taking on.
admin
chrismaverick 15 years ago
@maproomsystems: there are a couple of issues I have there.

1) I just don't have the time to organize something like that
2) even if I did, I probably wouldn't. As I've said several times, I really don't want to force any more of "my rules" on the group than I have to in order to keep the group on point. I don't want to be responsible for deciding who is and isn't a stalker. First of all, my definitions of "creepy" don't necessarilly match up with the other 400 active posters. Just like I don't want to censor anyone by saying "no nudity" or whatever. I don't want to censor anyone's reading either. Second, I find the concept of saying "posters aren't stalkers to be relatively silly." As people said in another thread, you don't know how creepy any of us are, whether we post or pictures or not. How do you know that Jen and I are creepy sickos masturbating the night away at your pictures but we just happen to be decent photographers in our own right? In general, I figure you just have to accept that if something is on the internet, people are going to see it. Its out of your control. So you have to impose your own judgement about what you are comfortable with people posting. And that shouldn't be my judegement. It should be different for each and every one of you.

@wooble: yeah, see, I think that's considered abuse of the reasonable policy.

@pi c's: thanx for handling that.
DaveRitchie02 Posted 15 years ago. Edited by DaveRitchie02 (member) 15 years ago
I'd like to think that at least you and Jen aren't creepy sickos Chris, and I'm not either - so that's at minimum three in the group that aren't. Don't draw conclusions if I didn't include anyone else in the "non creepy sicko class" here in my post...

Also, the group does behave realtively well I think and I, for one, appreciate the time you put into this.
fantastical quill [deleted] 15 years ago
chrismaverick and pic's,

I wasn't talking about stalkers, I was talking about finding a way to sort out who's following the rules. The only reason I mentioned the stalking aspect is that it's thus far the only reason that the matter of non-posting members has been raised.

Here's the main thing- I would really like to be able to click the "Members" link, and have it actually be a manageable list which represents people who are committed to the project. Otherwise, beyond slowly beginning to recognize the names of frequent posters or making extrapolations of daily # of photos, there's really no way for anyone to sort out how many real participants there are, let alone who they are.

If the mods reply to this and other discussions, I don't see how much more time it would take for them to check the handful of people who reach, say, 50 or 100 days in a row, and have made a post on a thread specifically for that function. If there's some other method which someone else can think of, then fine, but I'd like to get some other thoughts on the general matter of tiered membership.
DottieboBottie 15 years ago
www.flickr.com/photos/atali/292419124/in/pool-365days/

She has 4 pictures taken on same day posted.
d.rex 15 years ago
unless I'm missing something...

www.flickr.com/photos/somaliris/292437342/in/pool-365days

...another desk shot.
MOD
pi c's 15 years ago
@maproomsystems:
please do not take offense to this (and know that I typed this whole thing up much better and then it was LOST in cyberspace before I could post it :( !!)
I, as well as Mav, do not have the time to do what you are asking. Although it's fine if you want others feedback, I do not foresee any of those ideas occurring. If you, or any other member, feel that they are being a) stalked b) someone else is being "pervy" c) offended by another member etc... PLEASE do not hesitate to let us know. Otherwise, I already spend entirely too much time on flickr and need to minimize it...and spend more time wtih my family and taking my own photographs. I know that mav is in the same boat. We will continue to use yours and other members support in this thread and "scoop the floaters" as necessary in the kindest way possible. But outside of that...I think it's a closed discussion for now. Mav and I are the only 2 active admins...

@Dottie...she was asked and responded and now only 1 exists :D

@daverexwood...thanks, i left a note asking to remove it and replace it with one including a part of them :D
fantastical quill [deleted] 15 years ago
Okay, since the subject matter keeps getting turned back around to stalking for some strange reason, then I'll let it drop in this thread and try to find a clearer way to phrase things without using the "S" word.

I will say that it seems like you need more than 2 active admins, though, if overwork is getting to be a problem.
DottieboBottie 15 years ago
Thanks, Jen :)

How about we have threads for people to post in (I think Dave already started a few) that you can post in when you hit the 25, 50, 75, 100, 150 day milestones...that way we can see who has been pretty consistant and get a feel for the regulars.

Just a thought.
admin
chrismaverick 15 years ago
I'm often curious as to who the regulars are, but in the end, it doesn't really matter all that much. I just think its amazing as to see however many people there are doing this. By my calculations close to 400. I like the forum a lot, and I read it as much as I can, but the problem is of the 400 people actively posting pictures, maybe 30-40 of them are actively checking the forums, I'd guess. There are certainly some people who have been here since the beginning who don't read it. I think it comes down to what Maproomsystems said. The best way to really know who's active is just to pay attention. Watch the photos and sooner or later you're going to come up with some favorites. If you consistently like someone's stuff, maybe mark them as a contact. Comment. Maybe they'll return the favor. That's what I do.

And even for people who aren't my contacts, I love just popping in and looking at the last 2 or 3 pages of photos whenever I have a free moment. I almost always see something I love and feel like I have to comment on.
MOD
pi c's 15 years ago
ditto mav.

ditto dottie :-)

and as for more admins...i don't think it's really necessary at this point in time...less admins, less power issues...this, is, after all Mav's baby as far as i'm concerned...i'm just here to add a hand :D

and i don't think i meant to turn it back around to "stalkers" in my previous comment...just saying that it's not feasible nor desirable as far as mav and i are concerned at this time. please don't take offense.
d.rex 15 years ago
This is 1 of at least 4 from the same day/session...

flickr.com/photos/d-chimpanzee/290770756/in/pool-365days
d.rex 15 years ago
By the way...I keep toying with the idea of writing a little application that would suck down the 365 photo information and provide things like lists of people with n or more photos in the pool, people with lots of comments/faves, people who contribute regularly, etc. Just need to get around to doing it (and figure out if all that info is available...I think it is).

I'm a geek that way... :-)
few apparel [deleted] 15 years ago
I had also thought about doing that, perhaps incorporating it into my Flickr Finder app. (shameless plug)
admin
chrismaverick 15 years ago
thanx, daverexwood.

warned. Will wait to see if he deletes the pics himself.
metró 15 years ago
www.flickr.com/photos/rsmommy/293333618/in/pool-365days/
and
www.flickr.com/photos/rsmommy/293333616/in/pool-365days/

with the caption:

And yes, I posted two pictures from the same day in a row. Sue me.

???
admin
chrismaverick 15 years ago
warned... will allow her to delete.

thankyou, metró
Travelinjim 15 years ago
Yeah, Mav. I know you probably hate to hear this, but I was just looking through the rsmommy 365set. She's got lots of shots posted to the pool that were taken on the same days. A couple on the 11th, 13th, and the 15th was an especially photo filled day.

Fun pictures to look through at least. :)
Jack Scoresby 15 years ago
Mav, you just don't work hard enough.
admin
chrismaverick 15 years ago
She said she wouldn't do it again... as near as I can tell i have corrected it.
Wooble 15 years ago
d.rex 15 years ago
@wooble - as my first act as a 365 admin, I've asked her to remove one. thanks.
Billyterr 15 years ago
d.rex Posted 15 years ago. Edited by d.rex (member) 15 years ago
Yeah...I went to delete that one earlier and discovered that I don't know how. Doh! :-)

Once one of the other admins clues me in, it'll be taken care of. thx.

[ he just added another one...consider it reported ]
admin
chrismaverick 15 years ago
@Dave: If you look at the picture, there should be a little X next to the 365 Days Pool browser thingee on the side. If you click it, the image will remove. I'll leave it for you to do so you can make sure it works.
d.rex 15 years ago
:-) duh. thanks Chris.

I took care of these 2.
Travelinjim 15 years ago
MinivanNinja 15 years ago
I don't think a screenshot of Lonleygirl is a self-portrait

www.flickr.com/photos/locator/295336078/in/pool-365days/

I mean, it could be, but it's probably not
fantastical quill [deleted] 15 years ago
headcase, look to the extreme left of that photo by locator.
she's in there.
MinivanNinja 15 years ago
Oh, ok. Didn't even realize that was a face back there.
admin
chrismaverick 15 years ago
hique has been warned and asked to remove two of the photos.

I agree that Lonleygirl is in there. And screenshots count anyway.
numberless basket [deleted] 15 years ago
I may be missing it, but I don't see any bit of a person here:
flickr.com/photos/clarity25/295923472/in/pool-365days/
MOD
pi c's 15 years ago
a message has been sent to her asking to remove it from the pool and explained that a part of her must be seen in the photograph from now on.
clarity25 Posted 15 years ago. Edited by clarity25 (member) 15 years ago
Sorry about that . I removed my picture from the pool as soon I received the message.

I was holding up the fork but I cropped my finger out of the shot in the final editing without thinking. So as a result only the fork I was holding up was showing. Next time I'll include my hand or fingers. I apologize for that:) I'll be more careful in the future.
Wooble 15 years ago
admin
chrismaverick 15 years ago
Asked him to remove one.
TheBon 15 years ago
This one says that it was taken by someone else.
Travelinjim Posted 15 years ago. Edited by Travelinjim (member) 15 years ago
She (apparently) took three photos on the 9th of November and labeled them as three different days.
www.flickr.com/photos/ktiffany79/298408205/in/pool-365days/
admin
chrismaverick 15 years ago
We actually allow people to use the help of a friend to create self portraits, so I am inclined to allow Djuliet's picture, thought I did post a reminder comment for her that they should be self portraits, however that is defined.

I also sent mail to ktiffany asking her whether her pictures are from different days or not.
d.rex 15 years ago
FYI: I have asked DClassic to add only a few photos at a time to the pool. He agreed. He added about 35 at once before I noticed.
MOD
Um, this guy just dumped a crapload of images into the pool that are dated from 2005 (though that must be a mistake?)
Anyway, maybe a 'please don't flood the pool all at once" email?
www.flickr.com/photos/derekisthecoolest/79369210/in/pool-...
2 4 5 6 7 ••• 25 26
(101 to 200 of 2588 replies)
Groups Beta